http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1994/106.html Webadmissibility assessment, s 35(5) directs that South Africa's courts should determine firstly if admission of the evidence would render the trial unfair; and secondly what effect the …
Seville by Shea Homes - New Homes for Sale in Chula Vista
WebMar 20, 2009 · S v Sheehama (CA 201/2008) [2009] NAHC 42 (03 April 2009); Full judgment CA 201/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA HELD AT OSHAKATI In the … WebIn S v Sheehama 1991 (2) SA 860 (A) the court said that it is not necessary that concrete facts/evidence is discovered as a result of the pointing out. It is only necessary to show that the accused knew of a fact relevant to his guilt. pantai restaurant empire buffet
Evidence notes: Part 2 Flashcards Quizlet
WebNov 2, 2024 · CRIMINAL 22 of 2024 Title S v Sheehama (3) (CRIMINAL 22 of 2024) [2024] NAHCNLD 110 (02 November 2024); Media neutral citation [2024] NAHCNLD 110 Coram … WebS v Sheehama 1991 (2) SA 860 (A) FACTS: The accused was charged with 5 counts of murder. There had been a pointing out which related to the case and it had been induced by assaults and threats of the police. The accused had been warned by the police, but in such an inaccurate way that the accused felt that he was compelled to make the pointing ... http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2009/6.pdf sex drugs etc traduction